Global Cartel Defense and Coordination

More than 30 countries have active cartel enforcement agencies with the authority to severely penalize companies accused of cartel behavior. In today’s global economy, goods are shipped throughout the world. Cartel conduct in one country therefore can have serious repercussions in jurisdictions throughout the world, sparking investigations by multiple countries. The most prominent jurisdictions investigating cartels throughout the world are the United States, Canada, the European Union, Brazil, Japan, China, Australia, South Korea, the United Kingdom, and Taiwan. Our lawyers have successfully represented clients in cartel investigations involving all of those countries.

Our work for clients has many layers: We work with companies at the outset of investigations, handling the defense of grand jury investigations in the U.S. and responding to dawn raids in other jurisdictions. We quickly and efficiently conduct internal investigations to understand the scope of the potential problems a client faces. We advise on worldwide leniency strategies. We represent our clients throughout all phases of investigations, coordinating with local counsel in jurisdictions throughout the world. We are committed to providing our clients with the best cartel defense strategy to resolve multiple investigations on favorable terms.

There are many complex and nuanced issues to navigate in global investigations, each having ramifications. For example, there is often an issue as to whether to seek leniency in one or more jurisdictions or whether to continue to employ culpable employees. It takes years of experience, which we have, to advise on these difficult issues, consider both the legal and business implications, and navigate the various laws in multiple jurisdictions.

Our global cartel defense team is led by:

• Craig Seebald, with 30 years of experience in the area, he has defended numerous companies in global cartel investigations;
• Mike Scarborough has taken leading roles in many of the largest cartel matters of the past 25 years, including perfecting numerous corporate leniency positions with the Antitrust Division, obtaining closures of multiple criminal investigations without action, and spearheading the defense of clients in many of the largest civil multidistrict follow-on litigations in the U.S.;
• Zach Terwilliger, the former U.S. Attorney of the Eastern District of Virginia, where he prosecuted federal crimes, as well as the litigation of civil matters, and led a staff of more than 300 criminal prosecutors, civil litigators and support personnel across four offices;
• Steve Medlock, an experienced antitrust litigator with a unique mix of plaintiff and defense-side experience which allows him to see the issues that exclusively defense-side practitioners miss in a full range of antitrust and global cartel matters;
• Dylan Ballard, an antitrust litigator who has spent his entire 15-year career handling all phases of cartel practice, from government investigations, to individual and corporate criminal prosecutions, to multi-district class actions; and
• Chris James, a California-based litigator who is regularly called upon by clients to unravel and piece together complex facts, whether advising on internal compliance issues or matters with substantial exposure to criminal or civil liability.

Vinson & Elkins’ lawyers have represented corporate defendants and/or individuals in nearly every major investigation over the past decade.

In addition, our team has helped many companies avoid criminal investigations by proactively conducting internal investigations and conducting antitrust training. Indeed, we have also represented companies in obtaining amnesty from the Antitrust Division of the DOJ. The government has a very successful amnesty program that allows companies to self-report antitrust violations in return for an agreement that the corporation and its employees will not be prosecuted. In short, we know the process and are able to move clients through the investigation effectively and efficiently, and when necessary, we are prepared to litigate.